
|
old articles newest article our sketchy profile what it's all about contact zendom recommend us Leave a note |
2002-06-14 - 9:38 a.m. Fandomtwits and How Not to Be One Fandom ethics and etiquette. They keep fandoms grounded and running smoothly. In theory at any rate; practice, as you've no doubt found, is often quite different. Much like Real Life™, there are certain things You Just Don't Do and most people understand that. But there are - how shall we put this? - exceptions to the rule. The Fandomtwits. :cue thundering and ominous music, perhaps 'Tocatta & Fugue in D minor for young ladies in underwired nightdresses.': 'What exactly is a fandomtwit?' you may ask. It's fairly simple. A fandomtwit is a person or persons who happen to be unfortunately 'gifted' with large amounts of stupidity -- especially where basic fandom etiquette and ethics are concerned. Their crimes against fandom range from the mildly annoying to the 'death is too good for them' stupid, with a pit stop at 'foaming-at-the-mouth-and-plotting-their-slow-painful-death' angry. They are and will no doubt continue to be apparent in fandom until a) it's possible to reach through your computer screen and strangle them and b) murder is no longer a punishable offence. Believe me when I say I'm waiting for that day with the utmost glee. Until then The Top 5 Golden Rules o' Fandom Ethics will have to suffice. What are the Golden Rules O' Fandom? I hear you ask. It's quite simple; they are the result of canvassing the Zendom Listsibs - as between us all we must have at least fifty years of fandom-time under our belt - for what they'd consider to be major rules for partaking in Fandom. It's all that plus a smidgeon of my own personal fandom experience collected together in the hopes that it'll help or guide someone out there as they tumble head first into the wonderful world of fandom. It's not meant to be the Be All And End All and I certainly don't claim to be perfect. It is, as already stated, a means of help and guidance. That said, on with the show. The Top Five Golden Rules O' Fandom. Or; Things I Wish Someone Had Told Me. [Note: The list is in reverse numerical order: 5,4,3,2,1.] 5. Thou Shalt Not Throw Thy Metaphorical Toys Out Of Thine Cot: In which mailing lists and the etiquette thereof are discussed. Mailing lists; they really are the backbone of fandom. From Ye Olde Days of Usenet to the Yahoogroups of today, they are where the fic ends up, where shows are discussed and friendships made. All good, clean fun really. But (and there is always a 'but') they're also the place where fandom ethics are most often trod underfoot as people suddenly gain the mental age of a five year old: running amok, throwing their toys out of the cot and generally falling into the idea that because it's the Internet, you can act like a spoilt brat and get away with it. You know of what I speak; Flame Wars and General Fandomtwittage, coming soon to an Inbox near you! There are many rules and guidelines that go along with Mailing Lists and what follows are only the ones that came up the most often when I canvassed my listsibs.
4. Thou Shalt Not Open Thy Trap To Change Foot: In which why outing fic and fandom is not such a great idea is discussed. Note: This section deals with two fanfic subsets; Fictional Person Fic (FPF/S) and Real Person Fic (RPF/S) but there are things that both share and rather than writing them out twice, I'll be dealing with them first. And in case you're wondering, I'm active in both Fictional and Real fandoms and have seen some of these things first-hand. In the words of Gandalf: Keep it Secret, Keep it Safe. Now, I'm not saying that we should be lurking at the back of the closet or shoving it under the rug but in general fandom experience, it's *never* a good idea to shove fanfic out into the spotlight. And when I say 'spotlight' I mean The Powers That Be (TPTB) of your show or in the case of RPF, the people you are writing about. It's not big and it sure as hell isn't clever. Here are a few hard-and-fast rules that are applicable to both fandom subsections.
Let me give you a few general examples of things that have happened when fandoms have been given the bad spotlight treatment. They're generalised because apart from the fact there are certain legal reasons that prevent me from giving more details, I've got no personal wish to get hauled up for defamation, plus, as tempting as it is to name and shame because frankly, some people deserve it, I am writing an article on Fandom Ethics and hypocrisy is not something I'm fond of.
3. Thou Shall Let Ye Author Know What Thou Thinketh: In which feedback and the etiquette there of is discussed. How many of us *don't* like receiving feedback on our fics? Show of hands? Thought so, we all like getting feedback, we like to know what people thought of the fic; whether it touched them in some way or whether they thought it was downright hot. It's one of the reasons we post our fics. If I didn't want feedback, I'd write my stories and leave them on my hard-drive where the only person who could see them would be me. And I don't know about everyone else but I like the feedback where constructive criticism is offered (Keyword there being 'constructive') better than a one-liner that just says something like: "Wow! I loved it! Write more!" Unfortunately, it would seem that those of us who do are being increasingly outnumbered by those who don't. Everywhere you go it seems that 90% of the lists operate a "No negative comments!" rule, with just about anything vaguely critical considered "negative" and therefore bad.
2. Thou Shalt Get A Second Opinion: Beta readers and why they're A Good Thing. I'm just going to take this moment to thank my beta readers in advance, because I know that once I finish this article and send it off to them, they'll rip it apart and put it back together again, with suggestions. Which is what beta readers are there for. So, beloved betas? Thank you. Beta Readers are, in general, worth their weight in gold, and this is from a writer's point of view. I never used to use a beta reader when I started writing fic but I do now and I can see the difference in my work. That's difference to the point of cringing every time I read one of my old fics and wondering why in the hell I didn't use a beta reader. They're A Good Thing because they provide you with a second opinion and tell you what works and what doesn't. And then, they offer suggestions and replacements and help you polish it up, ready to face the world. And more often than not, you'll find that your story has improved (hooray!) after you and your beta have picked it apart. It's far too easy to miss mistakes, especially when you've been staring at a fic for ages; they haven't, so they're a fresh pair of eyes and that tends to save you from embarrassing mistakes that you can't correct because the fic is out there, it's on the mailing lists and you can't get it back.
1. Thou Shalt Not Claim Others Work As Thy Own: Plagiarism. The dictionary defines plagiarism as follows: The act of plagiarizing; taking someone's words or ideas as if they were your own, and you know what? I would love not to have to do this section. It would be so fricking great if plagiarism didn't happen. But it does. So not only is the Golden Rule Number One, it's also, as far as I'm concerned, The Golden Rule that laid the Golden Egg. It's not big and it's not clever and yet people still do it. And it's the most-often broken Fandom Ethic. In Real Life, plagiarism can get you expelled from College and University, or in the case of a fellow Zendom listsib's Ancient History department; your brain extracted via your nose. I'm personally, all in favour of the last one for use in fandom. Heh. It may appear by that definition that writing fanfiction is plagiarism but it's not. We're using other people's characters without their permission but we don't hide that fact, all fic is disclaimered with references to who really owns them which pulls it out of plagiarisim and into the realm of copyright infringement, but that's a whole new tangent that I'm not going to go into here. Crediting and disclaimers, by the way, do not mean you can steal a fic and put a disclaimer on it saying so. The plagiarism that I'm referring to is inter-fandom or intera-fandom stuff. It's not nice, you know, to spend a lot of time on a fic: Writing, researching, drafting and redrafting etc only to see it suddenly reappear under someone else's name, only with different characters or a different fandom, all because someone else was too lazy to write a fic themselves. And the problem with on-line fandom rather than the old paper-based, is that's it's so huge and changes all the time, so theoretically, someone could get away with it. However, with the fact that it's on-line, it means that people are active in more than one fandom and this means that they have more chance of spotting plagiarised fic. You read a fic in say, Forever Knight and then a couple months later, that fic pops up in Buffy, with just the characters and fandom changed and you contact the original author and the whole thing snowballs from there on and the so-called author is banned from the list(s). It's not as good as, say, removing their brains through their nose because they can change emails and names and no one would be any the wiser, but at least the fandom is more aware of the problem and people keep an eye out. All in all, it's a bad thing. Don't Do It. Forchristssake. So there you have it. The Five Golden Rules o' Fandom, in numerical order and all. Here's hoping they help someone out there or at the very least, amused you. And egads, I'm wordy. Meghan is an 18 year old expat South African who crash-landed into fandom in the summer of '98. She's a self-confessed fandom butterfly who at the time of writing this, is active in seven fandoms, some receiving more love than others. When she's not doing fandom-related things, she can be found attached to the network at college cursing in Elvish as it eats her work and spits it back out. She's in the middle of an advanced IT course and plans to be a web designer when she grows up.She's also popculture's willing whore, as the amount of references in this article will prove.
|